Alexander Efremov
Book Discovery Call
🇬🇧
🇩🇪
Three Solution Levels
The Governance Void
Challenge: A System of Systems (SoS) cannot be managed centrally by definition; it is a federation of independent partners united by a goal. However, without agreed rules, this federation devolves into a loosely coupled feudal society. Stakeholders use ad-hoc "trial and error" methods to integrate, resulting in endless friction and incompatibility.

Solution: There are successful precedents for such agreements (e.g., the Leidraad SE in the Dutch Civil Sector). But simply copy-pasting them is Cargo Cult. I help you author the Guidelines for your specific national or industrial reality. I facilitate the dialogue between Ministries and Industry to agree on a Common Ontology and Process—creating a unified language for the next 20 years.

Reference: Leidraad SE V3 (Functional Specification).
Managing the Beast
Challenge: You have the mandate to manage the entire lifecycle—Stations, Tracks, Signaling, Rolling Stock. But your organisational capability lags behind your responsibility. You are trying to manage a 21st-century cyber-physical network with 20th-century tools (loosely coupled PLMs, Databases, maybe even emails and documents). You need a powerful internal IT & Methodology engine, but your IT team doesn't understand Engineering, and your Engineers don't understand Data.

Solution: Building the Enabling System. I don't just "teach you SE". I help you architect your internal Digital Factory.
  1. Methodology-to-IT Bridge: I translate complex Systems Engineering requirements (Lifecycle, Ontology, V-Model) into clear specifications for your IT department.
  2. The "Multi-D" Backbone: I help you design the functional architecture of your Project Management Information System (PMIS) so it creates a true "Digital Twin" of your assets, not just a file repository. I ensure your Enabling System is smart enough to handle the complexity of the Managed System.
The Mindset Shift
Challenge: Your best engineers are overwhelmed. They are used to solving technical problems, not systemic political/technical knots.

Solution: Systems Leadership Mentoring. I coach your key personnel to think in terms of "Capabilities" and "Missions", to think of the whole life cycle of their system, to scope their system. I turn them into autonomous leaders who can uphold the framework without me.
Cross-Industrial Cases
Experience from High-Tech and Safety-Critical Industries
Governance Framework
Ending the "Feudal" Fragmentation
Challenge: A large engineering organization suffered from "silo mentality" (feudalism). Different departments used different standards and vocabularies (Ontologies), making system-wide integration impossible.
Solution: Designed and rolled out a unified Governance Framework. Facilitated a "Constitutional Agreement" between stakeholders to adopt a Common Ontology and Process Standard (similar to Leidraad SE principles), respecting their operational independence but enforcing interoperability.
Result: Unified "Rules of the Game" Adopted.
Semantic Interoperability
Ontological Data Re-engineering
Challenge: A massive legacy database held critical "Master Data" (Stammdaten) regarding complex assets (Materials/Configuration). The data structure had drifted away from physical reality, turning the database into a "Digital Graveyard" rather than a Digital Twin.
Solution: Instead of a blind "Lift and Shift" migration, I applied the BORO (Business-Object Reference Ontology) approach. We reverse-engineered the "IT spaghetti" (relational tables) back into real-world business objects to validate semantic consistency.
Result: Semantic Clarity extracted from Legacy Chaos.
Digital Backbone
From Documents to Data (MBSE Integration)
Challenge: The project managed complex requirements (Requirements) and interfaces using disconnected Excel sheets and PDF specs. The "Enabling System" (IT tools) was not synchronized with the engineering reality, leading to data inconsistency.
Solution: Architected a Data-Centric Enabling System. Integrated the Requirements Management tools with the System Architecture models, creating a "Single Source of Truth" that IT could support and Engineers could use.
Result: Digital Continuity Established.
Interface Management
The "Civil vs. Logic" Peace Treaty
Challenge: Critical integration points between physical infrastructure and control logic (Signaling/Software) were undefined. Each "kingdom" optimized its own scope, ignoring the boundaries.
Solution: Established a rigid Interface Governance Protocol. Introduced formal Interface Control Documents (ICDs) and "Conflict Mitigation" boards to force distinct disciplines to agree on boundary conditions before construction.
Result: Unified "Rules of the Game" Adopted.
Capability Building
From "Engineer" to "System Architect"
Challenge: Engineers and System Owners tend to think of their own product, not about how it is going to work embedded into a bigger system. The whole life cycle from concept through design to decomission is also difficult to take care of.
Solution: One-on-one mentoring for key Technical Directors. Shifted their focus from "Component Ownership" to "Capability Orchestration" and System of Systems thinking.
Result: Leaders equipped to manage Complexity.
You have the Mandate.
I have the Method
Whether you want to reform the Industry or just save your current Project—it starts with clear Rules.
Book Discovery Call
Alexander Efremov

Germany, 2026 © All Rights Reserved