Leave a Case
INCOSE CAB Call for Solutions 2026 • Research Initiative

The Human Interface of Systems Engineering

Behind every baseline, milestone gate, and SysML model lies an unwritten network of status preservation, informal trades, and tactical compromises. We are investigating the micro-sociological friction that normative standards overlook. Our goal is to give Systems Engineers a Guideline for the Human Aspect. Support our research by sharing your stories.

🔒 Swiss-Hosted Encrypted Storage
⚖️ Chatham House Rule
🛡️ Technical Black-Box (No IP)

The Watermelon Status

Status report is always green... until the sudden crash.

Zero-Risk Paralysis

We can't decide as long as there is a 1% residual risk.

Rogue Shadow IT

Engineering units quietly build unapproved tools and shadow pipelines.

24-Hour Amnesia

Clear workshop consensus mysteriously evaporates overnight.

The Doom Prophets

Three team members whisper: "We'll never pull this off anyway."

Fractional Chaos

12 concurrent priority initiatives, each staffed with half an engineer.

The "Not My Job" Abyss

Critical interface boundaries where nobody assumes ownership.

The Elephant in the Memos

"We urgently need to address X" — and the topic is perpetually avoided.

Backstage Whispers

"I'd better call them directly off the record instead of logging it formally."

Typical organisational challenges. Do you know specific examples? This is what we are interested in!

ENGAGEMENT PROTOCOL

Research Participation & Boundaries

You choose the level of involvement and your boundary of comfort. No organizational exposure, no technical disclosure.

CHATHAM HOUSE RULE APPLIED
TIER 1 // ASYNCHRONOUS

Written or Audio Narrative

⏱ 10–15 minutes • Direct intake

Describe a real sociotechnical interaction (e.g. a milestone review, an unwritten trade-off, or cross-discipline friction) in your own words using our structured prompt. No calls or scheduling required.

Voice or Text Encrypted Swiss Storage Confidential
TIER 2 // TARGET STANDARD

Semi-Structured Deep Dive

⏱ 45–60 minutes • Remote sync

A confidential 1-on-1 interview exploring backstage coordination, "saving face", informal compromises, and metrics distortion. The full verbatim transcript is returned to you for redacting prior to analysis.

Member-Checking Included Full Redaction Veto Chatham House
Available post-vignette or by invitation
TIER 3 // INSTITUTIONAL

Field Observation & Shadowing

⏱ By meeting duration • On-site/Virtual

Passive observation of engineering synchronization rituals, architecture boards, or micro-analysis of recorded retrospective meetings. Strictly subject to bilateral non-disclosure and research agreements.

Enterprise Charter Institutional NDA Department Level
RESEARCH ROADMAP & INSTITUTIONAL MILESTONES

From Theoretical Foundations to Industry Guidelines

Addressing the INCOSE Corporate Advisory Board (CAB) Call for Solutions
INCOSE CAB RESEARCH AGENDA
FOUNDATION Aug–Sep 2026
COMPLETED

EMEASEC 2026 Presentation

Delivered foundational presentation on cognitive resistance, neurobiology, and sociological interfaces in Linköping.

Linköping, Sweden // Presentation
VALIDATION Nov 2026
IN PROGRESS

Dutch SE Days 2026 (DSED)

Scientific paper submission and presentation on architecting human-system interfaces across disciplinary boundaries.

Eindhoven, Netherlands // Paper
PHASE 01 Q4 2026
ACTIVE INTAKE

Field Vignettes & Data Sessions

Crowdsourcing encrypted voice notes and qualitative narratives. Joint data sessions grounding Goffman's dramaturgy.

Fieldwork // Data Sessions
PHASE 02 Q1–Q2 2027
SCHEDULED

INCOSE IS 2027 Paper Submission

Peer-reviewed symposium paper defending empirical findings against CFS-C2-03, CFS-C4-01, and CFS-C6-04 priorities.

Symposium Track // Advisory Review
PHASE 03 Summer 2027
COMMISSIONED

Targeted Industry Pilots (JIP)

Field testing backstage interface heuristics and watermelon risk protocols within live engineering programs at CAB member enterprises.

Joint Industry Projects // Enterprise Calibration
DELIVERABLE Late 2027+
PRACTICE GUIDELINES

The Interface Navigation Map

Not a rigid standard, but a territory map focusing on CFS-C2-03, CFS-C4-01, and CFS-C6-04: practical guidelines and heuristics for navigating informal barriers, status rituals, and cross-discipline interface friction.

CAB Guidance // Practitioner Toolkit
Alexander Efremov

Germany, 2026 © All Rights Reserved